Franciscan scholar dismisses teaching of Catechism, Pius XII on Adam and Eve

In comments appearing in diocesan newspapers across the United
States, Father Michael Guinan, a professor of Old Testament at the
Franciscan School of Theology in Berkeley, California, has dismissed the
teaching of Venerable Pius XII on polygenism and the Catechism of the Catholic Church on the historicity of Adam and Eve. 

In his 1950 encyclical Humani Generis, Pope Pius taught that

When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion,
namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such
liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains
either that after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not
take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first
parent of all or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents.
Now it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with
that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the
Teaching Authority of the Church propose with regard to original sin,
which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam and
which through generation is passed on to all and is in everyone as his
own.

Father Guinan told Catholic News Service--which did not publish comments
from other scholars with orthodox views--that in the decades since the
encyclical’s publication, “the Catholic Church has accepted the use of
historical-critical tools to understand the Scriptures … The question of
biological origins is a scientific one; and, if science shows that
there is no evidence of monogenism and there is lots of evidence for
polygenism, then a Catholic need have no problem accepting that.” 

Commenting on the Catechism of the Catholic Church's teaching
that “the account of the fall in Genesis … uses figurative language, but
affirms a primeval event, a deed that took place at the beginning of
the history of man,” Father Guinan, who taught for 13 years at the San
Francisco archdiocesan seminary, said:

It recognizes
that Genesis is figurative language, but it also wants to hold to
historicity. Unfortunately, you can’t really have both. The Catechism is
clearly not the place to argue theological discussions, so whoever
wrote it decided, as it were, to have it both ways.

“The man and woman of Genesis … are intended to represent an Everyman
and Everywoman,” he added.

“They are paradigms, figurative equivalents,
of human conduct in the face of temptation, not lessons in biology or
history. The Bible is teaching religion, not science or literalistic
history.”

Source